Manju Warrier’s Big Disclosure in the Actor Abduction Case Ignored by the Trial Court

A major news item came out in connection with the 2017 actress abduction case involving actor Dilip, in which the Kerala High Court was told by the state government that the trial court erred. The witness in the case. Manju’s ex-husband Dilip has been accused of kidnapping and raping the actress who was a friend of the couple. Warrior had revealed to the court that he had tried to influence her through his daughter. Muthan Movie Review: Manju Warrior, Vicky Kaushal and Anjali Menon shower for Nivin Pauly Starr.

Dilip: Manju Warrior Reveals Dilip To Influence Her Daughter

In the entered application News minuteThe government is seeking to move the case to another court through an application. According to the petition, “At the retrial, the special prosecutor asked her when she last spoke with her daughter. Manju said her daughter had approached her on February 24, 2020, and asked her to not take anything against her father (Dilip). “I have told my daughter that it is my duty to disclose the truth before the court,” Manju Warrier said.

During the cross-examination, the petition mentions how the questions were asked in a way that makes Manju a bad mother. “Questions were asked to prove that she had not approached her daughter for years. At the re-examination, the special prosecutor asked her daughter for the last time. On February 24, 2020, Manju Warrior dismissed her daughter as telephone and requested that her father not dismiss anything.” Kayattam: Manju Warrior is treating fans with a new poster of his first production venture on Swimming 2020 (see pic).

Kerala gold smuggling case: Former Kerala CMO general secretary M Sivashankar arrested by ED

“There have been numerous instances during the trial of witnesses, in which the judge refused to record pieces of evidence supporting the prosecution and decided to record answers in a manner favorable to the accused by documenting that the accused ‘adds’ and ‘makes the evidence clear.’

The trial court did nothing to shield the witness from the mass trauma generated at the cross-examination, but the witnesses were supposed to be court guests, ”the government said in a petition.

Disclaimer: The above information is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information on the Site.